La objeción de conciencia en el diseño de inteligencia artificial:

Angel Jeancarlo Coaquira-Flores

doi:10.35383/apuntes.v8i2.1339

Angel Jeancarlo Coaquira-Flores Investigador Independiente. Lima, Perú. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-0954

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35383/apuntes.v8i2.1339

Keywords: Conscientious objection, Artificial intelligence, Technology, Civil rights

Abstract

The disruptive expansion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has had a cross-cutting impact on all areas of human activity, offering significant advantages but also substantial risks to human rights. Thus, among the problems arising from its misuse are mass surveillance, social manipulation, and the application of intelligent systems for military purposes. Thus, in response to this problem, a debate has arisen about the relevance of recognizing the right to conscientious objection in the design and development of technologies, particularly in the field of AI. Consequently, this article examines the legal nature of conscientious objection from a doctrinal and normative perspective, thus making it possible to analyze its possible configuration as an ethical defense mechanism against potentially harmful technological projects. Finally, we propose essential elements that could characterize a possible conscientious objection in the technological field, with an emphasis on AI, advocating for specific regulation that reconciles the moral integrity of professionals with the public interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aparisi, A. & López, J. (2006). El derecho a la objeción de conciencia en el supuesto del aborto: de la fundamentación filosófica-jurídica a su reconocimiento legal. Persona y Bioética, 10(1), 35-51.

Barkane, I. & Buka, L. (2025). Prohibited AI surveillance practices in the Artificial Intelligence Act: promises and pitfalls in protecting fundamental rights. En V. Galis, H. Gundhus & A. Vradis. (Eds.). Critical Perspectives on Predictive Policing: Anticipating Proof? (pp. 110–129). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035323036.00011

Barnes, E. & Hutson, J. (2024). AI and the Cognitive Sense of Self. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 3(1), 35-51. https://doi.org/10.54963/jic.v3i1.320

Basuchoudhary, A. (2025). AI and Warfare: A Rational Choice Approach. Eastern Economic Journal, 51, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-024-00280-7

BBC Mundo (05 de abril de 2018a). Qué es el polémico Proyecto Maven que Google desarrolla con el Pentágono y por el que sus empleados están en pie de Guerra. British Broadcasting Corporation. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-43662384

BBC Mundo (25 de junio de 2018b). La dura carta de los empleados de Amazon en la que piden a Jeff Bezos que deje de vender tecnología al gobierno de Donald Trump. British Broadcasting Corporation. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-44601388

Card, R. (2020). A New Theory of Conscientious Objection in Medicine: Justification and Reasonability. Routledge.

Cuzzolin, F., Morelli, A., Cîrstea, B. & Sahakian, B. (2020). Knowing me, knowing you: theory of mind in AI. Psychological Medicine, 50(7). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720000835

De Silva, D. & Alahakoon, D. (2022). An artificial intelligence life cycle: From conception to production. Patterns, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100489

Erskine, T. & Miller, S. (2024). AI and the decision to go to war: future risks and opportunities. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2349598

Fernández, Y. (09 de abril de 2018). Qué es Project Maven y por qué 3.100 empleados de Google le piden a la empresa que lo abandone. Xataca. https://www.xataka.com/empresas-y-economia/que-es-project-maven-y-por-que-3-100-empleados-de-google-le-piden-a-la-empresa-que-lo-abandone

Fontes, C., Hohma, E., Corrigan, C. & Lütge, C. (2022). AI-powered public surveillance systems: why we (might) need them and how we want them. Technology in Society, 71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102137

Gallagher, R. (13 de septiembre de 2018). Senior Google Scientist Resigns Over “Forfeiture of Our Values” in China. The Intercept. https://theintercept.com/2018/09/13/google-china-search-engine-employee-resigns/

Garrido-Moreno, A., Martín-Rojas, R. & García-Morales, V. (2024). The key role of innovation and organizational resilience in improving business performance: A mixed-methods approach. International Journal of Information Management, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102777

Google (s.f.). AI Principles: Our AI Principles. https://ai.google/principles/

Guo, C., Liu, H., Song, F. & Guo, J. (2025). The double-edged sword effects of algorithmic opacity: The self-determination theory perspective. Acta Psychologica, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105600

Hambling, D. (17 de octubre de 2023). Ukraine’s AI Drones Seek And Attack Russian Forces Without Human Oversight. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2023/10/17/ukraines-ai-drones-seek-and-attack-russian-forces-without-human-oversight/?sh=69da7b6b66da

Handoyo, S., Suharman, H., Ghani, E. & Soedarsono, S. (2023). A business strategy, operational efficiency, ownership structure, and manufacturing performance: The moderating role of market uncertainty and competition intensity and its implication on open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100039

Have, H. & Patrão, M. (2021). Conscientious Objection. En H. Have & M. Patrão. (Eds.). Dictionary of Global Bioethics (pp. 347–348). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54161-3_169

Hervada, J. (1984). Libertad de conciencia y error sobre la moralidad de una terapéutica. Persona y Derecho, 11, 13-53. https://doi.org/10.15581/011.32653

Heval, Ö. (2013). Conscientious Objection to Military Service in International Human Rights Law. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hoffman, F. & D'Amelio, A. (2024). AI’s impact on war’s enduring nature. Orbis, 68(1), 72-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2023.11.006

Ienca, M. (2023). On Artificial Intelligence and Manipulation. Topoi, 42, 833–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09940-3

Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J. & Shimada, A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Implications for Policymakers, Researchers, and Practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09747-0

International Business Machines Corporation (2023). Understanding the different types of artificial intelligence. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-intelligence-types

Jones-Nosacek, C. (2021). Conscientious Objection, Not Refusal: The Power of a Word. The Linacre Quarterly, 88(3), 242–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639211008271

Kassner, J. & Lefkowitz, D. (2012). Conscientious Objection. En R. Chadwick. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2da ed.). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00373-2

Kavitha, V. & Akila, C. (2022). A deep learning approach toward prediction of mental health of Indians. En S. Jain, P. Jain, K. Pandey & K. Phooi. (Eds.). Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Mental Health in Pandemics: A Computational Approach (pp. 141-165). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91196-2.00009-0

Kolev, K., Dykes, B., Kang, S., Hughes-Morgan, M. & Ferrier, W. (2024). Fast or slow? A meta-analysis on the performance implications of decision, implementation, and response speed. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/27550311241291976

Magwentshu, M., Chingwende, R., Jim, A., Rooyen, J., Hajiyiannis, H., Naidoo, N., Orr, N., Menzel, J. & Pearson, E. (2023). Definitions, perspectives, and reasons for conscientious objection among healthcare workers, facility managers, and staff in South Africa: a qualitative study. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2184291

McCausland, T. (2023). Ethics in Innovation. Research-Technology Management, 66(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2023.2257107

Microsoft (s.f.). Microsoft Responsible AI: Principles and approach. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/principles-and-approach

Mucci, T. & Stryker, C. (18 de diciembre de 2023). What is artificial superintelligence? IBM. https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/artificial-superintelligence

Olawade, D., David-Olawade, A., Wada, O., Asaolu, A., Adereni, T. & Ling, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in healthcare delivery: Prospects and pitfalls. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100108

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (s.f.). AI principles. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html

Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (2022). Recomendación sobre la ética de la inteligencia artificial. UNESCO.

Osimen, G., Newo, O. & Fulani, O. (2024). Artificial intelligence and arms control in modern warfare. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2407514

Plociennik, C., Watjanatepin, P., Van Acker, K. & Ruskowski, M. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Applications: Research Gaps and Opportunities. Procedia CIRP, 135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2025.01.079

Poulson, J. (23 de abril de 2019). I used to work for Google. I am a Conscientious Objector. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/opinion/google-privacy-china.html

Rashid, A. & Kausik, A. (2024). AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277

RenAIssance Foundation (2024). The Call. https://www.romecall.org/the-call/

Saghiri, A., Vahidipour, M., Jabbarpour, M., Sookhak, M. & Forestiero, A. (2022). A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Challenges: Analyzing the Definitions, Relationships, and Evolutions. Applied Sciences, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084054

Saheb, T. (2022). Ethically contentious aspects of artificial intelligence surveillance: a social science perspective. AI Ethics, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00196-y

Sánchez, R. (2020). La objeción de conciencia frente a la eutanasia: un análisis biojurídico. Apuntes de Bioética, 3(1), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.35383/apuntes.v3i1.398

Sánchez, R. (2024). Objeción de conciencia, dignidad humana y vida humana: Presupuestos y análisis a la luz de las sentencias del TEDH y de la CIDH. Editorial Tirant Lo Blanch.

Sheikh, H., Prins, C. & Schrijvers, E. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: Definition and Background. En H. Sheikh, C. Prins & E. Schrijvers. (Eds.). Mission AI: The New System Technology (pp. 15-41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21448-6_2

Sufyan, M., Shokat, Z. & Ashfaq, U. (2023). Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnosis and therapy: Current status and future perspective. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107356

Symons, X. (2023). Why Conscience Matters: A Theory of Conscience and Its Relevance to Conscientious Objection in Medicine. Res Publica, 29, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-022-09555-2

Toomey, L. (2020). The Right to Conscientious Objection to Military Service: Recent Jurisprudence of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. Human Rights Law Review, 19(4), 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngz031

Vuković, D., Dekpo-Adza, S. & Matović, S. (2025). AI integration in financial services: a systematic review of trends and regulatory challenges. Humanities and social sciences communications, 12(562). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04850-8

Williamson, S. & Prybutok, V. (2024). The Era of Artificial Intelligence Deception: Unraveling the Complexities of False Realities and Emerging Threats of Misinformation. Information, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/info15060299

Wong, J. (04 de diciembre de 2020). More than 1,200 Google workers condemn firing of AI scientist Timnit Gebru. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/dec/04/timnit-gebru-google-ai-fired-diversity-ethics

Yiannaros, A. (2018). Refusing to Kill: Selective Conscientious Objection and Professional Military Duties. Journal of Military Ethics, 17(2), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2018.1548995

Conscientious objection in the design of artificial intelligence

when the law questions the algorithm

Abstract

Downloads

References