David vs. Goliath (Case Planned Parenthood and the selling of aborted baby body tissues)
The slippery slope of abortion legalization
Abstract
After the legalization of the constitutional right of women to abortion in the United States with the case Roe vs. Wade, the door was opened to many consequences that this decision brought with it. One of these consequences is the illegal sale of organs and tissues extracted in abortions. In the present article a bioethical and biolegal analysis will be developed of the case that brought to light that slippery slope of the legalization of abortion, this is the case of the research of the non-profit organization, Center for Medical Progress (CMP) to the multinational abortion, Planned Parenthood, and the consequent investigation and final report presented by the Select Panel of the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the US House of Representatives.
Downloads
References
The Center for Medical Progress. (2015). Estados Unidos. Recuperado de http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org
The Center for Medical Progress. (2015). Human Capital an investigative journalism study by CMP. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/human-capital/
The Center for Medical Progress. (2015). Investigative Footage. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/cmp/investigative-footage/
Agulles Simó, P., & Gillén Pascual, M. (2011). Ética de la Investigación Biomédica: Trasplantes, Vacunas y Embriones. Valencia: Editorial cultural y espiritual popular S.L.
Bernal, C. A. (2016). Metodologia de la Investigación (3 ed.). Bogotá: Pearson Educación.
Blackmun, H. A., & Supreme Court of the United States. (1972). U.S. Reports: Doe v. Bolton 410 U.S. 179. [Periodical] Recuperado de Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep410179/.
Blackmun, H. A., & Supreme Court of the United States. (1972). U.S. Reports: Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113. [Periodical]. Recuperado de Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep410113/.
Breyer, S. G., & Supreme Court of the United States. (2000). U.S. Reports: Stenberg, Attorney General of Nebraska, et al. v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914. [Periodical]. Recuperado de Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep530914/.
Cornell University Law School. (1971-1973). Supreme Court of the United States of America. Doe vs. Bolton 410 U.S. 179. Recuperado de https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/179
Cornell University Law School. (1971-1973). Supreme Court of the United States of America. Roe vs. Wade 410 U.S. 113. Recuperado de https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/410/113%26amp
Cornell University Law School. (2006-2007). Supreme Court of the United States of America. Gonzales vs Carhart 550 U.S. 124. Recuperado de https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/05-380
Cornell’s Legal Information Institute (LII), Justia, y Chicago-Kent College of Law. Oyez. (s.f.). Body Politic. The Supreme Court and Abortion Law. Roe v. Wade. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18
Cornell’s Legal Information Institute (LII), Justia, y Chicago-Kent College of Law. Oyez. (s.f.). Body Politic. The Supreme Court and Abortion Law. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/91-744
Cornell’s Legal Information Institute (LII), Justia, y Chicago-Kent College of Law. Oyez. (s.f.). Body Politic. The Supreme Court and Abortion Law. Stenberg v. Carhart. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de https://www.oyez.org/cases/1999/99-830
Cornell’s Legal Information Institute (LII), Justia, y Chicago-Kent College of Law. Oyez. (s.f.). Body Politic. The Supreme Court and Abortion Law. Gonzales v. Carhart. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de https://www.oyez.org/cases/2006/05-380
Cornell’s Legal Information Institute (LII), Justia, y Chicago-Kent College of Law. Oyez. (s.f.). Body Politic. The Supreme Court and Abortion Law. Ch. 1. Roe v. Wade. Estados Unidos. Recuperado de https://projects.oyez.org/body-politic/ch1
Fox News. (2017). ObamaCare replacement bill approved in House. Recuperado de http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/04/obamacare-replacement-bill-approved-in-house.html
Hernandez Sampieri, R. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. (6 ed.). Mexico: McGraw-Hill.
Kaplan, T., & Pear, R. (4 de Mayo de 2017). House Passes Measure to Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Act. The New York Times. Recuperado de https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/04/us/politics/health-care-bill-vote.html?_r=0;
May, W. E. (2013). Catholic Bioethics and the Gift of Human Life. . Estados Unidos: Our Sunday Visitor Inc. .
O'Connor, S. D., Kennedy, A. M., Souter, D. H., & Supreme Court of the United States. (1992). U.S. Reports: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833. [Periodical] Recuperado de Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep505833/.
The authors retain copyright.
This work is under international license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
The articles published by the scientific journal "Notes on Bioethics" of the Universidad Catolica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo, Chiclayo Peru, can be shared through the international public license Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
LIBRARY USAT