Bioethics for the success of climate action

Keywords: climate action, global bioethics, climate resilient development

Abstract

Climate change is the world’s most pressing challenge that threatens all life on planet, and caused primarily by human activities that emit exorbitant amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This threat multiplier impacts natural and human health, infrastructure and systems. Climate action via mitigation and adaptation is possible, and climate resilient development is within human reach. However, the national and international commitments, and the available solutions to keep global temperatures from rising above 1.5°C, as agreed in the Paris Accord during COP21, have been insufficient in their ambition and execution.

Global bioethics for its respect for all life, for its inclusive nature and for recognizing the human being as a responsible administrator of the biosphere, is necessary to promote and achieve effective and fair climate action. This article seeks to encourage the integration of global bioethics in climate resilient development’s planning and implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acuerdo de París. (2015). UNFCCC. https://bit.ly/3C1WfCV

Boccardo, P. (2020). Bioética del medioambiente: un débito a Jahr y a Pôtter. En F. León (Ed.), Bioética y medio ambiente. Fundación interamericana ciencia y vida, 22-41. https://bit.ly/3PRApaY

British Broadcasting Corporation, [BBC] (1 de noviembre de 2021). COP26: Not fear, but hope. [Grabación de discurso de Sir David Attenborough]. British Broadcasting Corporation, Science. https://bbc.in/3FPcl42

Carlton, J. S., Perry-Hill, R., Huber, M., & Prokopy, L. S. (2015). The climate change consensus extends beyond climate scientists. Environmental Research Letters, 10(9), 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/9/094025

Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático (25 de enero 2019a). António Guterres: “El cambio climático es la mayor amenaza a la economía global”. UNFCCC, Comunicado de prensa externo. UNFCCC News, Comunicado de prensa externo. https://bit.ly/2HvL6jX

Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático (12 de septiembre de 2019b). El cambio climático y la pérdida de biodiversidad amenazan los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. UNFCCC News. https://bit.ly/3I16vPK

Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P. T., Anderegg, W. R. L., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E. W., Carlton, J. S., Lewandowsky, S., Skuce, A. G., Green, S. A., Nuccitelli, D., Jacobs, P., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., & Rice, K. (2016). Consensus on consensus: A synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

Crutzen, P. J. & Stoermer E. F. (2000). The “Anthropocene”. The International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP) Global Change News Letter, 41, 17-18. https://bit.ly/3PRewJ4

Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene. Nature, 415(6867), 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/415023a

Denton, F., Wilbanks, T.J., Abeysinghe, A.C., Burton, I., Gao, Q., Lemos, M.C., Masui, T., O’Brien, K.L., & Warner, K. (2014). Climate-resilient pathways: adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 1101-1131.

Femia, F. & Werrell, C. (2013). Climate change before and after the Arab Awakening: The cases of Syria and Libya. En: The Arab spring and climate change: A Climate and Security Correlations Series. Center for American Progress, 23-32. https://ampr.gs/3PWkx7qFrancisco, P. (2015). Laudato si’: Carta encíclica sobre el cuidado de la casa común. Palabra. https://bit.ly/3PSCyTQFriedlingstein, P., Jones, M. W., O'Sullivan, M., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Le Quéré, C., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Anthoni, P., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Bopp, L., et al.,(2022) Global carbon budget 2021. Earth System Science Data, 14(4), 1917-2005. https://bit.ly/3vj8vLO

Gore, T. (2020). Combatir la desigualdad de las emisiones de carbono. Por qué la justicia climática debe estar en el centro de la recuperación tras la pandemia de COVID-19. Oxfam. https://bit.ly/3VtbH1Q

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2022a). Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 3–33. doi:10.1017/9781009325844.001.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2022b). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009157926.001.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (s.f.) Sobre nosotros. ¿Qué es el IPCC?. https://bit.ly/3jxCiNVIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Field, C.B., V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandrea, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, and L.L.White (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press 1-32.

International Global Biospheric Programme. (31 de octubre de 2010). Have we entered the "Anthropocene"? https://bit.ly/3WNQctT

Kanter, J. & Revkin, A. C. (30 de enero de 2007). World Scientists Lead Consensus on Climate. New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3GiBEg9

Kapoor, A. & Debroy, B. (4 de octubre de 2019). GDP Is Not a Measure of Human Well-Being. Harvard Business Review, Economics. https://bit.ly/2VdzyoGKrugman, P. (1997). Earth in the Balance Sheet: Economists Go for the Green. Slate, The Dismal Science. https://bit.ly/3vAHSlLLeón Correa, Francisco J. (2020). Bioética y crisis global medioambiental. En F. León (Ed.), Bioética y medio ambiente, 7-20. Fundación interamericana ciencia y vida. https://bit.ly/3jpawTP

Lynas, M., Houlton, B. Z. & Perry, S. (2021). Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 16(11), 114005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966

Mendoza Luna, M. Y. & Díaz Vásquez, M. A. (2022). La urgencia de la bioética personalista en el cuidado ambiental. Apuntes De Bioética, 5(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.35383/apuntes.v5i1.713

National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] (2022). What is the Greenhouse Effect. https://go.nasa.gov/3WDXJey

National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] (s.f.b) Scientific Consensus: Earth's Climate Is Warming. https://go.nasa.gov/3jpaMlL

National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA] (s.f.a). Do scientists agree on climate change? https://go.nasa.gov/2XvevxR

National Centers for Environmental Information. (2022). Climate at a Glance Global Time Series. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. https://bit.ly/3Z0LQS6

National Public Radio Staff. (September 8, 2013) “How Could A Drought Spark A Civil War?”. National Public Radio. https://n.pr/3YQctsB

Oreskes, N. (2004). The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change. Science, 306 (5702), 1686–1686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103618

Potter, V. R. (1996). Real Bioethics: Biocentric or Anthropocentric? Ethics and the Environment, 1(2), 177–183. https://bit.ly/3Q0W54D

Rigaud, K.K., de Sherbinin, A., Jones, B., Bergmann, J., Clement, V., Ober, K., Schewe, J., Adamo, S., McCusker, B., Heuser, S., & Midgley, A. (2018). Groundswell: Preparing for Internal Climate Migration. World Bank. https://bit.ly/3Ggq19J

Ritchie, H. (2020). Sector by sector: where do global greenhouse gas emissions come from? Our World in Data. https://bit.ly/3BZT6n6

Ritchie, H., Roser M. & Rosado, P. (2020). CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Our World in Data. https://bit.ly/3jpxCK5

Schipper, E.L.F., Revi, A., Preston, B.L., Carr, E.R., Eriksen, S.H., Fernandez-Carril, L.R., Glavovic, B.C., Hilmi, N.J.M., Ley, D., Mukerji, R., Muylaert de Araujo, M.S., Perez, R., Rose, S.K., & Singh, P.K. (2022). Climate Resilient Development Pathways. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, 2655–2807, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.027.

Sternberg, T. (2013). Chinese drought, wheat, and the Egyptian uprising: How a localized hazard became globalized. En: The Arab Spring and Climate Change: A Climate and Security Correlations Series. Center for American Progress, 7-14. https://ampr.gs/3I3ndhEThoreau, H. D. (2004). Walden and civil disobedience. Simon and Schuster.

United States Agency for International Development [USAID] (2017). Report: Climate Change Risk Honduras: Country risk profile. United States Agency for International Development https://bit.ly/3Vr1qDxU.S. Global Change Research Program, (2018). Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II: Report-in-Brief [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 186, 7-14 doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.RiB

Vassallo Cruz, K. L. (2019). Bioética, persona y familia: una bioética que humaniza. Apuntes De Bioética, 5(1), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.35383/apuntes.v2i1.240

Vernadsky, V. I. (1945). The biosphere and the noosphere. American Scientist, 33(1), 1-12. https://bit.ly/3vjsI3S

World Economic Forum. (2021). The Global Risks Report 2021. Editorial WEF, https://bit.ly/3FW6Lg9

World Food Programme Staff. (2021). Honduras: Climate change, coronavirus and caravans. How the World Food Programme is helping to break the cycle of hunger and migration in Central America's Dry Corridor. United Nations World Food Program. https://bit.ly/3vAIkQZ

Published
2022-12-28
How to Cite
Núñez García, P. J. (2022). Bioethics for the success of climate action. Apuntes De Bioética, 5(2), 34-55. https://doi.org/10.35383/apuntes.v5i2.798
Section
Bioethics, Society and Environment